An architectural hypothesis of multiple truths: first notes

Abstract

This essay addresses the nature of truth, exploring different hypotheses and theoretical-philosophical considerations. The objective is to analyze the semiotic constructions of language, establishing general axioms and investigating the existence of entities at different levels of representation. The methodology includes demonstrations and examples to illustrate the relationship between enunciation and existence, as well as the variation in relative truth according to the observers' perspectives. Categories such as natural truth, transient relative truth, perspectivist, intelligible and transmissional truth are presented, each examining specific aspects of the object's condition and its predicability. The essay also addresses the enunciator's paradox, which reflects the complexity of the enunciation of truth due to the intransparent linguistic structure, the ideological influence of the enunciator and the abstraction of the truth itself. It is concluded that all truth is a relative abstraction, highlighting the difficulty of communicating absolute truths due to the subjective and complex nature of language and human interpretation.